hfbHealth, Food & BiotechnologyHealth, Food & Biotechnology2712-7648РОСБИОТЕХ10.36107/hfb.2024.i3.s249hfb-249Research ArticleРЕДАКТОРСКАЯ СТАТЬЯEDITORIALИнституциональный адрес электронной почты автора научной статьи: стандарт доверия в академической среде и инструмент редакцииInstitutional Email Address of the Author of a Research Article: A Benchmark for Trust in Academia and a Tool for Editorshttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8252-6150ТихоноваЕлена ВикторовнаTikhonovaElena V.tikhonovaev@mgri.ruhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0328-3109КосычеваМарина АлександровнаKosychevaMarina A.kosychevama@mgupp.ruРоссийский государственный геологоразведочный университет имени Серго Орджоникидзе (МГРИ), Москва, РоссияРоссияSergo Ordzhonikidze Russian State University for Geological Prospecting (MGRI)Russian Federation20241412202463610Copyright © Тихонова Е.В., Косычева М.А., 20242024Тихонова Е.В., Косычева М.А.Tikhonova E.V., Kosycheva M.A.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.hfb-journal.ru/jour/article/view/249

Статья рассматривает проблему утраты актуальности контактных адресов электронной почты в научных публикациях, что затрудняет научную коммуникацию и воспроизводимость исследований. Обсуждаются возможные решения, включая обязательное использование институциональных адресов электронной почты, их перенаправление, а также интеграцию с онлайн-идентификаторами, такими как ORCID. Авторы подчёркивают необходимость строгих политик журналов для повышения прозрачности и устойчивости контактных данных. Особое внимание уделено решениям, способным улучшить взаимодействие между авторами и читателями научных статей.

The article addresses the issue of outdated contact email addresses in scientific publications, which obstructs effective scientific communication and the reproducibility of research findings. Possible solutions are discussed, including the mandatory use of institutional email addresses, their forwarding, and integration with online identifiers such as ORCID. The authors emphasize the need for strict journal policies to improve the transparency and sustainability of contact data. Particular attention is paid to solutions that can improve the interaction between authors and readers of research articles.

корпоративный e-mailинституциональная почтанаучные журналыпрозрачность научной коммуникацииэтика публикационной активностифабрики статейакадемическое довериеcorporate emailinstitutional mailscientific journalstransparency of scientific communicationethics of publication activitypaper millsacademic trustReferencesAbalkina, A., & Bishop, D. (2023). Paper mills: A novel form of publishing malpractice affecting psychology. Meta-Psychology, 7, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2022.3422Abalkina, A., & Bishop, D. (2023). Paper mills: A novel form of publishing malpractice affecting psychology. Meta-Psychology, 7, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2022.3422Al-Khatib, A., & Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2017). What rights do authors have? Science and Engineering Ethics, 23(3), 947–949. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-016-9808-8Al-Khatib, A., & Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2017). What rights do authors have? Science and Engineering Ethics, 23(3), 947–949. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-016-9808-8Kozak, M., Iefremova, O., Szkoła, J., & Sas, D. (2015). Do researchers provide public or institutional e-mail accounts as correspondence e-mails in scientific articles? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(10), 2149–2154. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23401Kozak, M., Iefremova, O., Szkoła, J., & Sas, D. (2015). Do researchers provide public or institutional e-mail accounts as correspondence e-mails in scientific articles? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(10), 2149–2154. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23401Liu, X.-M., & Chen, X.-T. (2021). Authors' noninstitutional emails and their correlation with retraction. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 72(4), 473–477. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24419Liu, X.-M., & Chen, X.-T. (2021). Authors' noninstitutional emails and their correlation with retraction. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 72(4), 473–477. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24419Rodriguez-Esteban, R., Vishnyakova, D., & Rinaldi, F. (2022). Revisiting the decay of scientific email addresses. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 73(1), 136–139. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24545Rodriguez-Esteban, R., Vishnyakova, D., & Rinaldi, F. (2022). Revisiting the decay of scientific email addresses. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 73(1), 136–139. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24545Shen, S., Rousseau, R., & Wang, D. (2018). Do papers with an institutional e-mail address receive more citations than those with a non-institutional one? Scientometrics, 115(2), 1039–1050. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2691-0Shen, S., Rousseau, R., & Wang, D. (2018). Do papers with an institutional e-mail address receive more citations than those with a non-institutional one? Scientometrics, 115(2), 1039–1050. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2691-0Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2021). Are mandatory institutional emails for manuscript submission an unfair and discriminatory policy? Journal of Interdisciplinary Medicine, 6(4), 189–191. https://doi.org/10.2478/jim-2021-0039Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2021). Are mandatory institutional emails for manuscript submission an unfair and discriminatory policy? Journal of Interdisciplinary Medicine, 6(4), 189–191. https://doi.org/10.2478/jim-2021-0039Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2024). Discontinuity between journals' registration and submission requirements for open researcher and contributor ID (ORCID). Nurse Author & Editor, 34(2), e12061. https://doi.org/10.1111/nae2.12061Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2024). Discontinuity between journals' registration and submission requirements for open researcher and contributor ID (ORCID). Nurse Author & Editor, 34(2), e12061. https://doi.org/10.1111/nae2.12061

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.